title4.jpg

Thursday, September 14, 2017

The Long-Jumper

In anticipation of Theresa May's upcoming speech in Florence, Talleyrand would recall another speech there about Europe that became rather famous -- by Roy Jenkins, nearly forty years ago: https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2010/11/15/98bef841-9d8a-4f84-b3a8-719abb63fd62/publishable_en.pdf

'I believe that a new, more compelling and rewarding but still arduous approach is necessary. We must also change the metaphor. Let us think of a long-jumper. He starts with a rapid succession of steps, lengthens his stride, increases his momentum, and then makes his leap'

Bonne chance, Madame May.

 

link 

Sunday, September 3, 2017

Korea

North Korea's regime now claims to have tested a hydrogen weapon. It has recently tested more missiles than it has in a long time. Yet, the consensus among the world's experts is still, after  some two decades, that the North Koreans are extortionists who can be alternately browbeaten or bought off, and the status quo ante will resume.

Talleyrand knows very little about these odd people. But he has asked a number of times -- eg here and here -- for evidence of the inner thoughts of the North Koreans. What if they are not extortionists but have some other aim besides 'regime survival'? Or, what if their definition of extortion is not the same as others'?

Governments that do not wish to fear the worst from North Korea need to determine a collective aim and then determine what each is prepared to do to achieve it. Even then, it may too late to impose a unified front against this menace of a regime, and succeed. But if there is to be any aim achieved that is not exclusively North Korea's, then certainly it will follow from a policy that is not based upon wishful thinking or upon any other speculation over what Kim Jong Un wants and will do, but upon what his adversaries want and need in this region.

The foregoing is not rocket science [sic]. It is, going by recent comments of senior American, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, and South Korean officials, not unfamilar. The question now is not whether or not it is being acted upon. One way or another, there will probably not be an undramatic denouement to this crisis. The question is whether its nature, scale, and scope will be decided by North Korea or by its adversaries -- in unison, or not.

link 

Friday, September 1, 2017

Perfidious Albion
 
Well, perhaps not perfidious, but certainly odd. After three rounds of negotiations and more than a year since their bizarre vote to leave the European Union, the UK is still pretending to whistle in the wind about 'Brexit'. Somebody, soon, needs to re-educate the British on the basics of diplomacy, starting with the definition of 'demandeur'. The British people have a good deal at stake, however much their government has been unserious, or worse.
link 

Tuesday, March 7, 2017

War Clouds
 
Colin Powell's old plan to fight two regional wars at once may need to be dusted and taken off the shelf if the daily rumours are true. Fortunately, the two adversaries it was long presumed to feature -- North Korea and Iran -- are again the most likely candidates. Which raises an obvious question: what have the Americans and their allies been doing for the past twenty years?
link 

Monday, January 23, 2017

Freedom Party

Talleyrand generally avoids interfering in the domestic affairs of other countries, but he cannot resist passing the following comment about the United States.

After having squandered much of the goodwill it had earned around the world during the 20th century, it probably makes sense now for the US to become lean and mean. There are plenty of vultures salivating over the behemoth. A majority (at least an electoral majority) of the American people know this. And many toes will hurt.

It is remarkable, then, that the defeated Democratic Party has not already begun to reinvent itself along an obvious track. That is not in the direction of an American labour party.

Instead, it should look to Woodrow Wilson, who, a century ago, stole the progressive thunder from the Republicans with something called ‘the New Freedom’. Today’s Republicans have asserted ownership over the ‘f’ word for some time, which is only fair, perhaps, given the origins of their own party in the Free Soil movement and party of the middle 19th century.

That movement’s slogan was ‘Free Soil, Free Speech, Free Labor, Free Men’. Today’s Democrats would do well to borrow and update it, in keeping with today’s economy, by replacing ‘soil’ with ‘minds’ and with today’s society, by replacing ‘men’ with ‘people’.

A new freedom party, standing for the freedom to live, work, travel, think, spend, and speak one’s mind, without prejudice or penalty, is the obvious antidote to what Democrats have described as an authoritarian, fearmongering, nasty party in power.

How long will it take for them to realise it?

link 

2017.09.01 | 2017.03.01 | 2017.01.01 | 2016.12.01 | 2016.10.01 | 2016.09.01 | 2016.07.01 | 2016.02.01 | 2016.01.01 | 2015.10.01 | 2015.08.23 | 2014.08.31 | 2014.08.03 | 2014.05.04 | 2014.04.20 | 2014.03.02 | 2014.02.16 | 2013.12.01 | 2013.10.13 | 2013.09.01 | 2013.08.25 | 2013.08.11 | 2013.06.23 | 2013.05.26 | 2013.03.10 | 2012.11.04 | 2012.10.28 | 2012.05.27 | 2012.05.06 | 2012.02.05 | 2011.11.27 | 2011.11.06 | 2011.10.09 | 2011.07.31 | 2011.07.03 | 2011.05.08 | 2011.05.01 | 2011.04.24 | 2011.04.03 | 2011.03.27 | 2011.03.20 | 2011.03.13 | 2011.02.20 | 2011.02.06 | 2011.01.30 | 2011.01.02 | 2010.12.05 | 2010.01.24 | 2010.01.03 | 2009.12.06 | 2009.11.29 | 2009.11.22 | 2009.11.08 | 2009.11.01 | 2009.10.25 | 2009.10.11 | 2009.10.04 | 2009.09.27 | 2009.09.20 | 2009.09.13 | 2009.08.30 | 2009.08.09 | 2009.07.19 | 2009.07.12 | 2009.07.05 | 2009.05.03 | 2009.03.08 | 2009.03.01 | 2009.02.08 | 2009.02.01 | 2009.01.25 | 2008.12.21 | 2008.11.09 | 2008.11.02 | 2008.10.26 | 2008.10.12 | 2008.10.05 | 2008.09.28 | 2008.09.21 | 2008.09.14 | 2008.09.07 | 2008.08.31 | 2008.08.17 | 2008.08.10 | 2008.07.27 | 2008.07.13 | 2008.06.22 | 2008.06.15 | 2008.05.11 | 2008.04.27 | 2008.04.20

Link to web log's RSS file

“ surtout, pas trop de zèle “

 

 

This site  The Web 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Powered by Register.com